Wednesday, 29 September 2010
The unknowable
Since the speed of light is constant, there is a limit to how much of the universe we can ever see or explore. Beyond this limit, everything is unknowable. Does it make any sense to ask what could be in this unknowable region? Is what we could know of the universe simply a definition of the universe? Does God know the unknowable bit?
Friday, 20 August 2010
New number line
Could you invent a number system which has zero and pi as fundamental integers instead of zero and one?
What is the difference between 'identical' and 'indistinguishable'?
Here are some identical things:
• Fundamental particles of the same type (eg 2 electrons).
• Perfectly replicated DNA molecules
• A digital image (before it is printed or displayed on a screen)
• A poem remembered accurately by 2 people.
• Two identical numbers
Here are some indistinguishable things (or are they?):
• Copies of the same book - or any mass-produced product.
• 'Identical' twins
• Peas in the same pod
Tuesday, 10 August 2010
Monday, 9 August 2010
Friday, 6 August 2010
Imagination will save us
Monday, 8 February 2010
Problems with infinity
Considering all the difficult problems which the concept of infinity poses, Aristotle suggested separating the idea of ‘actual infinite’ from ‘potential infinite’.
If you add all the terms in the series: ‘a half plus a quarter plus an eighth plus a sixteenth … and so on’ you get closer and closer to One the more terms you add, but you never quite get there unless you have an ‘infinite number’ of terms.
But suppose we ban the idea of an actually infinite number and put in its place a very big (but real) number (L). Then, considered in this way as a sum of fractions, the number One would be ‘imperfect’ since it could never quite be really one! Of course, all the other natural numbers would be ‘tarnished’ in the same way.
How could this very big number L be defined?
Here are two suggestions for what L could be:
L1 The total number of particles in the universe. (about 1087)
L2 The biggest number anyone has ever thought of. (apparently there are lots of ways to generate huge numbers, but at any given time, one of them would be the biggest).
If it was, L2 this would be dependant on human (or perhaps computer) interaction – is this the first time that a mathematical quantity depends on human behaviour?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)